The first four years essay

Secondly, the fact that two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened is not enough to believe that resident would be best served if they voted Montoya out o office and reelected Varro. Besides, the author should rule out other factors other than the responsibilities of mayor that affect the turnout of the economic situation of the city. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal. Without taking these possibilities into account, the author can not convince me that the mayor V can do a better job than mayor M. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. The author fail to consider and rule out other criteriafor determining the best service people can get, such as the safety of neighborhood, the quality of the environment, etc. The line of reasoning is that because Montoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in population, the former event caused the latter. The article though persuasive enough would have been complelling if substantial information would have been given regarding the change in the number of unemployed in both of the mayor's tenure and the effectiveness of Varro as a Mayor in current times. However after a mere year we moved back to our old house in Ambergate where I lived until the biggest move of my life. Clearly, the residents of San Perdito would be best served if they voted Montoya out of office and reelected Varro. When I found out we were moving to a whole different country it came as quite a shock. Firstly the author assumed that unemployment rate and expansion of business opportunity are the only factors that would judge the service of mayor. Moreover, even with the assumption stated above, the forecast that the residents will be best served if the voted for the mayor V is still open to uncertainty. Overall, the argument failed to provide supporting evidences and facts to prove that the residents of San Perdito made a wrong choice by selecting Montoya as mayor. In conclusion, the line of the reasoning in this argument is problematic for the above flaws.

In conclusion, the line of the reasoning in this argument is problematic for the above flaws. This prediction will be false if the new business is larger and is beneficial for the residents of San Perdito in the long term.

Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened. Please provide feedback It is very likely that the mayor Montoya has impressed the residents on better environment harness, less crime rate and better public facilities, which in long run will benefit the residents.

advertising the reduced price of selected grocery

Only with more solid confirmation, along with more concrete evidences, can the argument be viewed as rational and verifiable.

When I found out we were moving to a whole different country it came as quite a shock. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. Also the author presents a fact that two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened in Montoya's servicebut gives no information whether business condition was better in the Varro's times or not.

Clearly, the residents of San Perdito would be best served if they voted Montoya out of office and reelected Varro.

Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. I will really appreciate this" ARGUMENT The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper: "In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito, the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased. The author fail to consider and rule out other criteriafor determining the best service people can get, such as the safety of neighborhood, the quality of the environment, etc. Kudos [? For example if crime has been the most important issue of the city and Montoya has handled this efficiently while Varro could not, the city would be best served by Montoya and not Varro. For example, perhaps a statewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Arguments that bypass relevant, complex reasoning in favor of stirring up emotions do nothing to establish their conclusions; they are also unfair to the parties involved. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. If the author is comparing the current economy with the most booming period of city San Perdito, the results are of course not appealing. It is quite possible that the overall economy was better four years ago and as a result the unemployment rate was better. Under Varro, who served as mayor for four years before Montoya, the unemployment rate decreased and the population increased. Or perhaps the current economic downturn is part of a larger picture of economic cycles and trends, and has nothing to do with who happens to be mayor.

In addition, the author would also have to present the justification to demonstrate more respects that can reflect the life level instead of just presenting the changes in population and unemployment rate.

In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. Firstly the author assumed that unemployment rate and expansion of business opportunity are the only factors that would judge the service of mayor. Secondly, the fact that two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened is not enough to believe that resident would be best served if they voted Montoya out o office and reelected Varro.

in the first four years that montoya

Two businesses have closed for each new business that has opened.

Rated 5/10 based on 3 review
Download
My First Four Years Of My Life